Friends use the Bandolier and love it, so I was originally going to get that but the reviews were hit and miss so I thought I'd try a cheaper version and see how it worked. I had several criteria: a case that keeps the iPhone face uncovered (for the ability to answer calls and take photos quickly), an attached wallet, and the wallet had to have zipper closure because I didn't trust snap closure, especially when the open end of the wallet is pointing to the ground while you're wearing the phone as a crossbody.After lots of searching, I bought four crossbody phone holders to compare: Bocasal, this Lameeku, ZVE, and the GGYANG.The LAMEEKU and ZVE came in sturdy boxes with a soft drawstring bag encasing the phone, so they win for presentation. The LAMEEKU has a padded feel (GGYANG, ZVE, and Bocasal all were similar fabric) and has quilt stitching. The stitching looks pretty clean and streamlined. (This is where Bocasal lost points.)The metal loops go through two little straps of fabric at the bottom of the case, under the wallet. I think this is where the phone case, over time, becomes strained and breaks (according to reviews). This is the same as the setup for the Bocasal and the ZVE. (GGYANG has metal loops go through the bottom of the case, so that seems more stable and easier to fix.)Some have complained that with this type of case, the wallet zipper interferes with the picture. That won't happen with the Bocasal (zipper closes at the bottom of the phone away from camera) and GGYANG (zipper is flat on the wallet and short). If you hold the phone at a certain angle, you can see the zipper pull. It doesn't bother me because I don't usually take photos other than right side up or horizontal with the charging port to my right. In both those cases, the zipper pull doesn't dangle in front of the camera. In the other positions, I don't think it's hard to hold the zipper pull down and shoot.The LAMEEKU zipper only goes around 3 edges of the wallet. For the Bocasal and ZVE, the zipper wraps around not just three sides but also a little on both ends of the fourth side. I think this is to make it easier to access the cards in the wallet.For the LAMEEKU (and ZVE), there are two "compartments" on each side of the wallet: one compartment is a slit and the second one on each side is an elastic strap with a piece of short and narrow fabric in the middle. I like the elastic strap part because your cards are lot easier to get out of those. However, the multiple compartments mean that you could put at least six cards in the wallet, but with the elastic strap, you could put more. It's still tight for me getting my cards out. (I don't keep that many in there.) That's why I preferred the flap of fabric that Bocasal used on the left side of the wallet.The wallet depth is 10/16" for all but the GGYANG, whose wallet was nonfunctional.The LAMEEKU and ZVE had my favorite look with the carabiner-style clasps, compared to the Bocasal and GGYANG, which used lobster clasps to attach the strap to the case. The carabiner clasps are much more aesthetically pleasing. One time, I did find that the LAMEEKU clasp came undone, which was very surprising. I'm not sure what happened but nothing fell. I'll be watching for that.The LAMEEKU had the thickest crossbody strap: 1/2" compared to 5/6" (GGYANG) and 6/16" (Bocasal and ZVE). The thicker strap could mean that the product is more durable. The bad thing about the LAMEEKU strap is that it is adjusted like a belt with holes and a tail. The crossbody straps for Bocasal and GGYANG were adjusted like bra straps. I know another reviewer mentioned the tail as a disadvantage. However, I can live with it because there is a loop to hold that tail down pretty well and I don't find the tail flying up or getting in the way.LAMEEKU came with a thin wrist strap as well. That was only 6/16". Bocasal also included a wrist strap. ZVE included a wrist strap (they forgot the crossbody, though, which is what I purchased).LAMEEKU, ZVE, and Bocasal advertised RFID protection. GGYANG did not.In the end, I picked LAMEEKU because of function and looks.